Skip to content

Fix(community/slinky): add missing instructions output variable - #5787

Merged
SwarnaBharathiMantena merged 4 commits into
GoogleCloudPlatform:developfrom
SwarnaBharathiMantena:swarnabm/slinky_add_instructions_output
Jun 17, 2026
Merged

Fix(community/slinky): add missing instructions output variable#5787
SwarnaBharathiMantena merged 4 commits into
GoogleCloudPlatform:developfrom
SwarnaBharathiMantena:swarnabm/slinky_add_instructions_output

Conversation

@SwarnaBharathiMantena

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR fixes a validation error in the community module hpc-slinky blueprint (hpc-slinky.yaml). The blueprint expects an instructions output variable to be exported by the slinky module to display post-deployment steps, but that variable was missing from community/modules/scheduler/slinky/outputs.tf.

@SwarnaBharathiMantena
SwarnaBharathiMantena requested a review from a team as a code owner June 15, 2026 11:22
@SwarnaBharathiMantena SwarnaBharathiMantena added release-module-improvements Added to release notes under the "Module Improvements" heading. release-bugfix Added to release notes under the "Bug fixes" heading. labels Jun 15, 2026
@gemini-code-assist

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses a validation error in the hpc-slinky blueprint by ensuring the required 'instructions' output variable is properly exported by the slinky module. This change facilitates better user experience by providing clear post-deployment connectivity and testing steps for the Slurm environment.

Highlights

  • Added missing output variable: Introduced the 'instructions' output variable in the slinky module to provide post-deployment guidance.
  • Updated documentation: Updated the README.md to include the new 'instructions' output in the documentation table.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize the Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counterproductive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for GitHub and other Google products, sign up here.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request adds a new instructions output to the Slinky scheduler module, detailing how to connect to the cluster and run basic Slurm commands, and updates the README documentation accordingly. The reviewer suggests adding a depends_on block to this new output to ensure it is only evaluated after all Helm releases are fully deployed, which prevents potential race conditions.

Comment thread community/modules/scheduler/slinky/outputs.tf
@LAVEEN

LAVEEN commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Hi @SwarnaBharathiMantena , thanks for fixing this ? May i know what is the root cause for this ?

Basically wanted to understand how validation started failing suddenly?

Comment thread community/modules/scheduler/slinky/outputs.tf
@LAVEEN

LAVEEN commented Jun 16, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

can you also please run the PR test for same

@SwarnaBharathiMantena

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

PR-test-slurm-gke test passed on the PR.

@SwarnaBharathiMantena
SwarnaBharathiMantena merged commit 5c8e8de into GoogleCloudPlatform:develop Jun 17, 2026
17 of 84 checks passed
Neelabh94 pushed a commit to Neelabh94/cluster-toolkit that referenced this pull request Jun 18, 2026
ep-nag pushed a commit to nagconsulting/cluster-toolkit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

release-bugfix Added to release notes under the "Bug fixes" heading. release-module-improvements Added to release notes under the "Module Improvements" heading.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants