Example 1: Developer builds a GenAI tool using Llama 3.1-405B and releases the tool on its platform. Developer’s platform includes an “about page” within the application or website that announces the creation of the new GenAI tool and explains its uses. In the first few sentences about the new GenAI tool, the “about page” states that the tool was "Built with Llama." This is an example of prominently displaying the required attribution. However, if Developer were to release a 4 page article about its new GenAI tool and only mention that it was "Built with Llama" somewhere on the last page or in a footnote, we would not consider it to be a prominent display of the required attribution. Developer also provides the Llama 3.1 Community License Agreement or a link to it with the materials related to the new GenAI tool, since it is considered a derivative work of Llama 3.1.
Example 2: Developer improves its existing service with new AI features built using Llama 3.2. Developer releases a blog post announcing its AI feature, and states that it was "Built with Llama" in the title, subtitle or first few sentences of the blog post. This is an example of prominently displaying the required attribution. Developer also provides the Llama 3.2 Community License Agreement or a link to it with the materials for its service, related to the new AI feature, since it is considered a derivative work of Llama 3.2.
Example 3: Developer builds an online library where AI models are available for download. It includes some Llama 3.2 models in its library. Along with the copy of Llama 3.2, it includes a “Notice” text file stating that “Llama 3.2 is licensed under the Llama 3.2 Community License, Copyright © Meta Platforms, Inc. All Rights Reserved.”