refactor: create instance with asynchronous - #20954
Draft
ecmadao wants to merge 4 commits into
Draft
Conversation
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The SyncInstanceWithOptions will list all databases in the instance and loop to create new database in the store
bytebase/backend/runner/schemasync/syncer.go
Line 348 in 58c3f95
So if a instance include many databases, the frontend creation will be blocked in the UX:
Make SyncInstanceWithOptions asynchronous and only sync necessary (engine, version, etc)
Mock a 5s delay for SyncInstanceWithOptions
I'm not sure if we need this change, PTAL @RainbowDashy @d-bytebase